Perhaps the biggest obstacle to communication in online settings is the lack of emotional cues. Facial cues dictate the mood and corresponding diction of two people in a conversation. During phone conversations, tone of voice communicates the emotions of the person on the other line. But with chat rooms, instant messaging apps and texting, any signals that would indicate the tone of a person’s words or their state of emotion are absent. Because of this, there have been some interesting accommodations. Perhaps the two most prevalent compensating behaviors are the use of emoticons and abbreviations. Emoticons use punctuation marks to illustrate common symbols that pertain to facial cues. For example, one would combine a colon and parenthesis to recreate the symbol of the smiley face indicating the happiness or satisfaction of the other person. To symbolize laughter, the abbreviation "LOL" standing for "laughing out loud" developed. Along with these, countless other symbols and abbreviations have developed including, "BRB" ("be right back"), "TTYL" (talk to you later) and specific designs incorporated by apps of a laughing face, sad face, crying face, angry face etc.

Now, as newer modes of communication are becoming more common, the rules of communication must adapt as fast as the technology. For example, one of the most popular new apps, Snapchat, is growing to have its own rules and etiquette. This app lets users send pictures or videos to friends that disappear after a couple seconds of viewing it. Initially, the thought that occurs to people when confronted by this app is its implications for sexting. Although it’s entirely possible to make use of Snapchat for that purpose, what the app has developed into is a form of communication that shares funny or interesting moments. Originally compared to Instagram by way of the app’s ability to broadcast pictures to many people, it has now become standard to communicate through Snapchat by sending pictures back and forth and using the caption bar for messages. The reply option on Snapchat specifically promotes this behavior, but Snapchat etiquette is not set in stone. It is becoming clear that Snaps personalized for the receiver expect a reply, but where ends this obligation? Some people use Snapchat specifically for the purpose of communication, while some use it to simply provide a visual update of their day. The newest update of Snapchat, an instant messaging add-on, seems to be catered to those who use the app to send messages back and forth. This new messaging add-on, along with the video chat feature will warrant new forms of social construct and expectations of behavior in accordance with this application.

Carl Jann C. Caranzo      

What is Netiquette? Simply stated, it's network etiquette --"Netiquette" is network etiquette, the do's and don'ts of online communication. Netiquette covers both common courtesy online and the informal "rules of the road" of cyberspace. That is, the etiquette of cyberspace. And "etiquette" means "the forms required by good breeding or prescribed by authority to be required in social or official life." In other words, Netiquette is a set of rules for behaving properly online.

Netiquette represents the importance of proper manners and behavior online. In general, netiquette is the set of professional and social etiquettes practiced and advocated in electronic communication over any computer network. Common guidelines include being courteous and precise, and avoiding cyber-bullying. Netiquette also dictates that users should obey copyright laws and avoid overusing emoticons.

Netiquette is a short form of network etiquette or Internet etiquette.

When you enter any new culture -- and cyberspace has its own culture -- you're liable to commit a few social blunders. You might offend people without meaning to. Or you might misunderstand what others say and take offense when it's not intended. To make matters worse, something about cyberspace makes it easy to forget that you're interacting with other real people -- not just ASCII characters on a screen, but live human characters. So, partly as a result of forgetting that people online are still real, and partly because they don't know the conventions, well-meaning cybernauts, especially new ones, make all kinds of mistakes

The book Netiquette has a dual purpose: to help net newbies minimize their mistakes, and to help experienced cyberspace travelers help the newbies. The premise of the book is that most people would rather make friends than enemies, and that if you follow a few basic rules, you're less likely to make the kind of mistakes that will prevent you from making friends.

The list of core rules below, and the explanations that follow, are excerpted from the book. They are offered here as a set of general guidelines for cyberspace behavior. They won't answer all your Netiquette questions. But they should give you some basic principles to use in solving your own Netiquette dilemmas.

Netiquette a colloquial portmanteau of network etiquette or 'etiquette, is a set of social conventions that facilitate interaction over networks, ranging from and to and Like the network itself, these developing norms remain in a state of flux and vary from community to community. The points most strongly emphasized about Usenet netiquette often include using simple electronic signatures, and avoiding multiposting, cross-posting, off-topic posting, hijacking a discussion thread, and other techniques used to minimize the effort required to read a post or a thread. Similarly, some Usenet guidelines call for use of unabbreviated English while users of instant messaging protocols like SMS occasionally encourage just the opposite, bolstering use of SMS language. However, many online communities frown upon this practice.

Common rules for e-mail and Usenet such as avoiding flamewars and spam are constant across most mediums and communities. Another rule is to avoid typing in all caps or grossly enlarging script for emphasis, which is considered to be the equivalent of shouting or yelling. Other commonly shared points, such as remembering that one's posts are (or can easily be made) public, are generally intuitively understood by publishers of Web pages and posters to Usenet, although this rule is somewhat flexible depending on the environment. On more private protocols, however, such as e-mail and SMS, some users take the privacy of their posts for granted. One-on-one communications, such as private messages on chat forums and direct SMSs, may be considered more private than other such protocols, but infamous breaches surround even these relatively private media.

"When someone makes a mistake – whether it's a spelling error or a spelling flame, a stupid question or an unnecessarily long answer – be kind about it. If it's a minor error, you may not need to say anything. Even if you feel strongly about it, think twice before reacting. Having good manners yourself doesn't give you license to correct everyone else. If you do decide to inform someone of a mistake, point it out politely, and preferably by private email rather than in public. Give people the benefit of the doubt; assume they just don't know any better. And never be arrogant or self-righteous about it. Just as it's a law of nature that spelling flames always contain spelling errors, notes pointing out Netiquette violations are often examples of poor Netiquette."

This term was first introduced in posts of the satirical “Dear Emily” news columns in 1983, but it originated before the World Wide Web. In that era, the commercial use of public posting was not popular and internet traffic was dominated by text-based emails, Gopher, Telnet and FTP from educational and research authorities.

Although the specific rules governing netiquette may be different depending on the forum being used, it is equally applicable to chatting, blogging, message boards, email and surfing the Internet.

Contraction of Internet etiquette, the etiquette guidelines for posting messages to online services, and particularly Internet news groups. Netiquette covers not only rules to maintain civility in discussions, but also special guidelines unique to the electronic nature of forum messages. For example, netiquette advises users to use simple formats because complex formatting may not appear correctly for all readers. In most cases, netiquette is enforced by fellow users who will vociferously object if you break a rule of netiquette.

Rule 1. Keep things friendly, yet professional

Networking is all about building business relationships, but remember the key word here is ‘business’. After all, you’re focusing on your career here, not your social life! Be sure to keep all your exchanges professional and have your business needs in mind at all times.

Your communication channels need to be businesslike, too. When it comes to networking, your Hotmail account and your personal mobile number just aren’t going to cut it. Try Gmail or Zoho for a custom email address and eVoice for a professional phone number. Similarly, add business contacts to LinkedIn, not Facebook. 

Rule 2. Build an equal relationship

Networking is a two-way street. Building business relationships involves giving help and advice to other professionals as well as getting things in return. For example, if you’re seeking someone’s opinion or asking them to help you out on a project, it’s only fair that you’ve offered them something similar in return (or plan to do so in the future). This kind of mutually beneficial connection is what you want to achieve when networking.

Rule 3. Be open, honest and trustworthy

There’s no place for sneakiness or hidden motives when it comes to networking. You don’t want someone to think you’re only trying to connect with them to gain a few referrals, or to bleed them dry of their best business advice.Instead, you want to be open and honest right from the start. Have a frank discussion with potential connections about what you’re hoping to gain from networking with them, and what they’d like to gain from connecting with you.

Rule 4. Network with relevance

Don’t try to network with anyone and everyone. Restrict your professional contacts and engagements to people and businesses in your industry – those whom you think it would be beneficial to develop a connection with. Don’t forget that the relationship has to be beneficial for them too.When considering a new connection, identify three things: their area of expertise, how they might be able to help you out professionally, and how you might do the same for them. These three factors will help you determine whether a business connection will be relevant or not.

Rule 5. Don’t expect too much

Again, this comes back to the point about equal business relationships. Don’t ask more of your connections than you’d be willing to give yourself. Exchanging advice, assistance and services is fantastic, but make sure you draw the line. As a professional, there are certain things you would not do without charging a fee. If you’re expecting someone else to give you these things without you paying for them, you’ll quickly lose their interest and respect.

Networking can often lead to successful partnerships, in which one or both parties employs the other to complete work with or for them. You need to recognise when it’s time to stop asking for services and start paying for them instead. And again, this goes both ways – don’t be afraid to charge people for your services when you think the time is right to do so!

It's not 'netiquette' that's in crisis, it's our time-crunched lives

Last weekend, Nick Bilton of the New York Times published a spirited tiradeagainst "impolite" people who leave him voicemails instead of sending texts, or send emails saying nothing but "thank you", or who commit sundry other offences against efficient digital communication. He'd successfully re-educated his parents, he explained, by ignoring his father's voicemails and communicating with his mother via Twitter.

Since then, it's been Digital Etiquette Week in the blogosphere. Gawker's Caity Weaver joined the anti-voicemail crusade – "Don't leave me a voicemail unless you're dying" – while Rebecca Greenfield, at the Atlantic, formulated her own new rule: "It's totally OK to ignore all voicemails – except for ones from parents." Matthew JX Malady, a writer for Slate, went so far as to call for the elimination of all email signoffs – "regards", "best wishes", and so on – and while he was at it, introductory salutations, too. "Dear? Hi? Hey?" he wrote. "Kill me now."

I know, I know: to varying degrees, the Netiquette Police all have their tongues in their cheeks. But when it comes to language and social customs, it's a good general rule that when people get so heated about other people not following some alleged "best" way of doing things, there's something else going on – and it's worth asking what.

The netiquette flap reminds me of the sporadic eruption, among British commentators, of objections to "Americanisms" creeping into the language. The extraordinary irritation these seem to provoke may say something about Britain's declining role in the world; it may say something about the individual complainants growing older, and wanting to assert some control over a fast-changing language. But what it isn't really about is "creeping Americanisms" – not least because a huge proportion of those much-hated phrases aren't Americanisms at all.

So why have the Netiquette Police forgotten the point, eloquently expressed a few days ago by Ian Leslie, that communication isn't solely about the most efficient transfer of information from one brain to another, but about the forging of relationships, and of the fabric of society itself? To this armchair psychotherapist, the answer seems pretty obvious: they have far too many incoming communications to deal with, and the demand that others be more "polite" is a cry for help – emitted moments before they vanish beneath the rising tide of emails, voicemails, texts and tweets.

Sending a business e-mail

It's Saturday afternoon, and you have the bestest idea ever about how to totally and completely revolutionize the company's overall productivity -- and it includes five rubber bands, two clown masks and roughly 15,000 bobblehead dolls.

Practically sweating glee, you fire up your work inbox and shoot off an e-mail to your entire department, outlining the plan in great detail. Almost as an afterthought, you scrawl, "No need to respond to this right now. I know that it's the weekend."

You're right, o genius of productivity, it is the weekend -- which means the only people who will see your e-mail are (a) people with no lives, (b) people who are paranoid and anxious, or (c) people with no lives who are paranoid and anxious.

Must you stress said people out even more with your idle ruminations? Plus, when everyone else gets to work on Monday, faced with the grim task of sorting through all the e-mail that has accumulated over the past few days, there your message will be, buried among the rubble and, consequently, forgotten.

When struck with lazy day inspiration, we suggest dashing off your e-mail and then scheduling it to be sent out on Monday morning -- there are plenty of apps, like Boomerang, that will let you do so. That way, your idea will shine through the tempest of weekend missives like the glorious beacon that it is -- plus, everyone won't hate you.

Calling a family member

You're at the local thrift store, and you happen upon the most darling china doll with a lovely, delicate face reminiscent of your treasured only son, who now works so, so far away in the crumbling asphalt jungle that is the city.

He's a high-powered man, you know, the founder of an ingenious app that promises to revolutionize the shambles that is modern-day romance (or so he tells you; in actuality, it's a mobile tool that catalogs all the best public restrooms for hooking up with randoms).

As you gaze into the oh-so-sweet face of Francis the Goatherd -- as his tag reads -- you feel the overwhelming urge to call up your own china doll and tell him about his dolly doppelganger. You pull out your ancient cracked flip phone and dial his number ... and recoil in horror as your loving son answers on the first ring with an enraged, "What, Mom? Who died?"

Although it would be easy to blame the broken doll shards -- you dropped Francis in your frenzied distress -- on your ungrateful son, one only has to look to one of the many synchronously ticking clocks on the thrift store wall to realize that 2 p.m. on a Tuesday is not exactly the best time for a check-in call with your pride and joy. Especially if he or she has lived up to that title by securing him/herself a cherry job.

Unless Francis the Goatherd has been possessed by the devil and is currently choking you to death, save any and all ruminations about his porcelain fingers for after work hours.

Tweeting about your super rad beach day ...

... after calling in sick. Unless they're utter Luddites, your bosses know how to use Twitter, too.

Netiquette: Texting or tweeting, time may not be on your side

When you send those texts, tweets or other digital messages can reflect poorly on you if you're not careful.

Timestamps are all over the ever-loving place on the Web: on your tweets, Facebook posts, text messages, ill-thought-out, angry e-mails to exes, etc.

And let me tell you, true friends and trolls, those little numbers matter more than you think.

Let's consider the aforementioned ill-thought-out, angry e-mail to an ex (because who hasn't sent one of those): Send it at 3 p.m. on a Monday, and you come off as righteous and wronged. Send it at 3 a.m. on a Saturday, and you come off as dangerous and deranged.

And that's just the tip of the numerical iceberg, kids. Read on for four instances in which timing is everything.

Texting a potential date

ou're a notorious night hawk, a rebel with a very good cause: monitoring the feeding habits of a very rare species of owl.

Consequently, you are mostly nocturnal. However, you still manage to meet a lovely "daylight person" (as you call people who adhere to the mainstream constraints of timekeeping) at jury duty one day.

A few nights pass, and you finally work up the urge to text her an invite to coffee, a missive you shoot off in between watching one owl rip off a mouse's head and sorting through another owl's freshly deposited pellets. Three nights later, she still has not responded, perhaps because the timestamp of your text read 3:30 a.m.

Look, we get that everyone is on a different clock and not all denizens of this thing we call Earth are 9-to-5ers, but let's just get this straight right now: If you text a romantic interest after, say, 10 p.m., they're going to think you're (a) drunk, (b) horny, (c) drunk and horny. Save your declarations of like for the daylight hours -- or else seek out a mate with similarly night owl-esque tendencies.

Cyberbullying and Other Netiquette in the News

We've seen some really good stories during the last several days concerning how students and teachers behave online.

• The Christian Science Monitor reports that a new study by Chicago youth-market research firm TRU finds one in three American teens has been the target of cyberbullying, and more than half say they know someone their age who has been targeted. This comes just days after a recent reportthat showed the issue lurked way behind on the list of parental Internet safety concerns, even after the cyberbullying-related suicide of Rutgers University freshman Tyler Clementi early this month.

Perhaps it's not surprising that parents are reactive, rather than proactive, to cyberbulling issues, as one expert tells The Christian Science Monitor.

• Meanwhile, Converge has a feature about the Connected Principals blog, a blog authored by principals and for principals that aims to give insights about successful school administration and in the process show principals the benefits of using social networking for learning.

While the blog's 24 authors from around the world mainly write and tweet, they also reach other administrators via a community Facebook page and monthly Elluminate sessions.

• And in Wisconsin, the Fond du Lac Reporter talks to local educators about the friend-or-not-to-friend debate that affects tech-savvy teachers who try to weave Facebook into their brick-and-mortar classrooms.

The Reporter found some teachers resisted "friending" their students because of responsibility of reporting any illegal or inappropriate student activities, but that others felt friending students helped uncover issues students might not want to discuss with a teacher face-to-face.